Post Publication Discussions and Corrections

The Editorial Board actively promote academic debate and constructive criticism of the research presented in our journal. While authors do not possess the right to veto unfavorable comments about their work, they do retain the option to respond to criticisms. It is imperative, however, that no referee comment or published correspondence includes any personal attacks on the authors. We strongly advocate for criticism directed towards the work itself rather than the researcher. Editors are tasked with editing or rejecting any statements that are deemed personal or offensive, ensuring that the discourse remains focused on the scholarly content and constructive critique. In the event that factual errors are identified, which impact the accuracy of the published record, we may choose to publish a corrigendum or erratum. This corrective measure aims to transparently address and rectify any inaccuracies, upholding the integrity and reliability of the scholarly content within our publications..

Journal encourages its readers and authors to notify them if they find errors. In the event that factual errors are identified, which impact the accuracy of the published record, we may choose to publish a corrigendum or erratum. This corrective measure aims to transparently address and rectify any inaccuracies, upholding the integrity and reliability of the scholarly content within our publications.